Dear Experts,
How can I add validations to the FMBB transaction,
a. Process and document type should correspond. Say for example If the user enters Process = ENTER, Document type should be ZX otherwise system should not allow the user to post the document
b. Remove Funded program form the header of the document
c. Check Fund against Functional areas
Please let me know your thoughts on the above concept
appreciate your responses!!
Hi everyone, I'm getting an error trying to clarify and post a payment position from a payment lot.
I have a program that selects the payment lot positions that I need to post, but before posting I need to change a field (Aditional info in the FPCPL clarifying screen). I haven't found any FM to CHANGE/MODIFY de payment lot so what I'm doing is a SUBMIT to another Z* program via job and in there I change the field by batch input/call transaction.
The problem is that when I execute without the "via job" statement, the clarification goes well, but when I use that statement, the CALL TRANSACTION issues an error with the text "DOCKING_CONTROLS" and "CREATE_ERROR" (message DB304). I have read other similar problems but no solutions. It seems that a screen of the batch input process is no supported by the back job.
I need to do it with "via job" because I want to execute various processes at a time and control all of them.
If somebody has something that may help, please answer. Thanks.
Hi Experts,
This is an implementation project of SAP S/4HANA ON-PREMISE 1511. We have BCS active ( EA-PS Release 800 and 0001 SP).
We are testing and We get incorrect FM account assignment derivation from FMDERIVE when posting Good Recepts with reference to PO of internal order (Account Assignment F).
We are using the flags available in table FM01X, specifically FLG_PO_PROTECT, but We get the message that function is obsolete.
We need all documents to inherit FM account assignments from the PO.
What are my options?.
Thanks.
Hi All
I have very urgent issue. We transported the all FM requests to production system. All customizing ok. For example I can see our financial management area and other customizing. But eventough I activate EA-PS in SFW5, we cant see publick sector menu in both spro and user interface.
How can I fix this?
Thank you
Hello folks,
We were getting the error FMCF 320 while posting Invoice Receipt. So we applied the Notes 2118110 and 1991999 and other prerequisite notes. We don't have any issue with invoice postings anymore. However, the FMEQ report (RFFMEPGAX) for encumbrance displays only the summary for reductions (amount type '0200') and not the detail lines anymore. Also the FM posting date (ZHLDT) column on the report is defaulted to 01/01/2016.
How can I get back the line items to display in the Document Journal report? Could the BADI 'FMRP_RFFMEPGAX_EXIT' be of any help?
Your help is greatly appreciated >>>removed by moderator<<<
Thanks in advance!
Message was edited by: Jürgen L
Hi Experts,
We have PSM -BCS activated, we are using commitment item, fund center, functional area and funded program as account assignment elements.
We have activated profile 000102 and We don´t need online payment update. The functional area is specially used in internal order.
We have Document Splitting activated and just we need as characteristics for General Ledger Accounting the profit center and the segment.
For technical reasons, Must all FM account assignments be defined as Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting?
Thank you
Adriana
Hi experts,
I am new to sap psm.I have a requirement from my client please help me out with the following
present FM account assignments used as follows
one fund+fund center (1:1 to profit centers)
but they want to control budget at cost center level now.
how to achieve this in the middle of the fiscal year? what changes to be made in fmderive?
thanks in advance
Regards
sajid
Dear Experts,
I am encountering a strange situation.
While trying to reserve a stock material through MB21 on AUC Internal Order using Mov Type 261, I am noticing that both Mov Type and Plant are not being picked up. Please see the trace below:
However, when performing the same activity for a CC using Mov type 201, it is being picked up properly. I have mapped them properly in FMDERIVE.
What could be the reason? and how can we resolve this?
Regards,
Amar Lal Lohano
Hi Gurus,
We acqusition asset from MM module. We use a dummy asset when we create PO. Everything is working correctly. But I have doubt about derivation in AS01. I dont want to derive any account assignment in AS01. Because I am deriving account assignment elements by dummy asset's characteristics. The budget consumes when we create PO. When we post the invoice from MIRO, we create a new asset ( real asset ) and changing with dummy asset which I was used in PO. The system derives when I create real asset in AS01.I want to derive dummy account assignment for AS01. Is there any impact If I made this?
Thank you very much
Best Regards
Dear All,
I am making an FI posting for year 2015. When I check the document, I see that it consumes budget from funds reservation of 2016. What could be the reason?
Regards
Hi Gurus,
Does someone know what is the "exit" that I can use to fill the filed "Target 1" in FMBLEXT´s trace ?
During the execution this "exit" must to be executed before FMBLEXT´s trace and already bring the filed "Target 1" filled.
For business reason I need to fill this field ("Target 1") or other field of FMBLEXT´s trace. This field I will use it into my Derivation Rule of FMBLEXT.
Best regards
Claudio
Hie
I believe I have maintained all configure for Earmarked fund for material reservation with business function PSM_FM_CI_1 activated but when I run program RFFMRP_MAT_RESERVATION to generate an earmarked fund I get an error with Message No. FMFG 271.
Any one to help resolve this error
Current process is to use version 1 as a working budget and transfer to 0 periodically as a published budget.
When using processing mode 2 in FMCYLOAD, the latest Transfer postings are not being identified to move across to the version 0.
Processing mode 0 & 1 appear to identify all correct values for the version, but add new data only does not.
Can anyone advise?
Hi Experts,
We have BCS active in SAP S/4 HANA, we are in a test client and We want to delete funds centers in FM area, before executing this transaction, we executed "Delete commitment data and actual data (FM_DLFM)" and " Delete budget data (RFFMKU_DEL_DATA)". The tables FMIOI, FMIFIIT and FMBDT are empty, but in table FMIT there are 33 records with zero amount. I think that records are preventing the fund center to be delete.
When I execute the transaction OFDF to delete, I get Message no. F6570 : Function not allowed, funds center XXX was already posted to. Also in transaction SLG1, I get Message no. FMUP087: Transaction data exists for FM area XXX in table FMIT.
Our Funds Center are not year dependent. How can I delete the FMIT records?.
I have used the transaction FMAF, but It doesn´t work.
Thanks in advanced for your comments.
Adriana
Hi Experts,
1> Field status under Network Activity for Fund Center and Commitment Item is in Display Mode(greyed out).
How & where to set the field status to Optional?
2> In the Network Activity the value for fund center is derived based on the derivation rule but Commitment item is blank.
Network activity is Internal.
Material assigned to the Network activity with Item category N.
GL a/c assigned is a consumption a/c & is of cost element in nature.
Based on all the above information how to derive the commitment item. Kindly provide the logic for derivation of commitment item derivation.
Regards,
Purnima
Experts!
I am trying to run the Subsequent FM activation mass activity FPFMDY for FICA, and getting the following error:
Message No. FKKFMCHK047
Anyone with an idea of how to resolve this, kindly assist.
Dear Experts,
I am trying to post student payment in Cash Desk transaction (T-Code: FPCJ) but when I press 'POST' button after entering all the necessary data, the system is giving me following GM error:
Message No. F6751
You have not made any entries for the FM account assignment element grant and have left the value as BLANK or SPACE.
The system does not carry out any further processing if you do not enter a value for the grant.
Enter a valid value for the grant.
Funds Management (FM) and Grants Management (GM) modules are already implemented at client organization but I can't see any 'Grant' field where value could be manually entered or picked through FM Derivation Strategy.
Here is the screenshot of transaction:
:
BASIS Team has already implemented the SAP note 735342 issued for similar error but error still persists.
Please guide how to resolve the issue OR otherwise if OSS note needs to be raised to SAP.
Regards
Muhammad Waseem
Dear Experts,
We have implemented GM,
The requirement is that the Purchase Order Commitment in the GM records, would be reduced once the Invoice is received.
Currently the PO commitment is reduced once the GR is posted, and not once the IV is posted (as we would like).
How can we change that?
Thank you
Orly
Dear Experts,
We have just implemented FM-BCS in the middle of the fiscal year. To update consumption from old documents before FM Activation, we used Reconstruction program FMN3N/FMN4N... After reconstruction, we experienced abnormal behaviours in PO creation from reconstructed PR as follow:
We have budget like this:
with consumption in PR
We create PO from PR with the exact same amount:
Normally, there will be no budget exceed in this step. However, in this case, the budget check inform a budget exceed of 1,100,000 (= Double amount of PR - Budget)
Can anyone have any suggestion how to solve this issue?
We are using EA-PS 600.
Thanks a lot,
Dear Experts,
When I am doing general PR PO, GR and IR. I get following FM derivations at MIGO and MIRO.
When Sub contracting process is executed, I get an error that commitment for GR/IR should be less than or equal to 40.
System is not deriving commitment item for GR/IR Clearing account from GL master data instead it is inheriting it from PO line.
Please guide me in this regard to understand the system behaviour.
Do i have to apply a specific SAP note or do i have to change that error message to warning?
Regards,
Atif