Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP for Public Sector
Viewing all 163 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Logistic's Contract with Funds Commintment

March 15, 2016, 8:17 am
$
0
0

Hi All.

 

I've two questions about Logistic's Contract with Funds Commintment.


First:

I did the customization of earmarked fund in FM and MM with the Commitment Plan flaged in the Contract's document type.

When a create a Contract(ME31K) only with Short Text(w/o Material) and blank account assignment, I'm able to create a Commitment Plan.

 

But, if I use a account assignment = K, I cant create a Commitment Plan.

This is because I most use the field Earmarked Funds in the Account Assignment at Contract's itens details?

If yes, I've to create a Earmarked fund document previusly of Contract? Or it will be created automatcaly?

 

 

Secund:

 

Our Spro is not enabling FM activity "Define Permitted Types of Earmarked Funds Documents in Purchase Documents".

 

We are using Former Budgeting, our EA-PS version is 600 (SAPKGPPD25) and SAP-APPL is 617(SAPK-61705INEAAPPL).

Yes, we know that we have to upgrade our EA-PS version, but we are trying to avoid this.

 

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards.

Leonardo.

↧
Search

FI/FM issue when doing Transfer posting in MIGO

March 17, 2016, 2:04 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I am doing Transfer Postings in MIGO with mvt type 309 and 310.

For 309 the fund center is posted in FI document , but in 310 is not, the FI posting is missing the fund center.

 

Please advise.

Thank you,

Sorina

↧
↧

FMCN Dump

March 17, 2016, 5:31 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We take dump in FMCN. . Selection screen as below. The error is about 3000 seconds limit. I have searched a note but couldnt find.

 

Could anyone guide me?

 

Sc.St1.PNG

Sc.St2..PNG

↧

FMCF101: Automatic Carry Forward Not Allowed for Amount 0

March 16, 2016, 8:55 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

My users  has wrongly performed CF via FMJ2 and reverse via FMJ3. The GR invoices shouldn't be CF to new fiscal year.

Thus invoice not able to be posted due to error FMCF 101. After debugging we confirm the error due to CF and reverse CF captured the GR value as nett zero as below. Amount type 0350 in table FMIFIIT.

 

But when we change the value to 0 instead of negative and positive value during debugging, the invoice can be posted, yet the reduction on GR amount type 0200 not posted.

 

OSS 1.JPG

Anyone can have any solution, please help.

↧

The function of “adjust ledger” of FM activation screen.

March 18, 2016, 2:39 pm
$
0
0

Hi...

I want to activate FM module for using BCS(Budget control system).

I don’t know the function of  “adjust ledger” in the below screen.

I use S/4 Hana 1511.

In old version, I didn’t find the function of “adjust ledger” in the below screen.

I want to know whether I select “adjust ledger” check box for using the BCS without error, or not.

FM_1.png

↧
↧

Availability control check on FUND CENTERS in SAP FM

March 15, 2016, 12:03 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

There is a client requirement that availability control check should be on fund centers rather than on PR,PO, GR or invoice. I did some search and i found two heads in IMG.

Define Derivation Strategy for Control Objects

Define Derivation Strategy for Tolerance Profiles

 

Is there any possibility for making a derivation strategy so specific tolerance profiles can be assigned to different fund centers so that a link can be made between tolerance profile and fund center. By this, different limits can be assigned to fund centers. It is an idea but i am not sure it works like this or not.

I have tried making derivation strategy for tolerance profiles and control objects but could not get the desired results.

 

Please help me in this regard. It will be a great help.

 

Regards,

Atif

↧

Purchasing Group source field in derivation rules (FMDERIVE)

March 21, 2016, 3:43 am
$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

Client require budget to be commitment based on purchasing group.

Is there a way to include Purchasing Group in the source field of derivation rules in FMDERIVE?

 

Regards,

Atif Amin

↧

Document was reassigned in the meantime

March 22, 2016, 3:06 am
$
0
0

Hi All

 

I am running FMCT after FMCN. Some documents are updating correctly, but some of them are has error that is "Document was reassigned in the meantime". I found a note 1940037. Our system release 6.00. I couldnt be sure that Should I upload this note? or Is there any way to pass this error?

 

Could anyone help me about this issue?

 

Thanks

Regards

↧
Search

Document Splitting Per Commitment Item

March 24, 2016, 1:06 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

I was wondering if you have come across any meaningful business need to have document splitting per commitment Item ? does it make sense ?

Best Regards,

Mohamed

↧
↧

Query on billing in public sector management - NCD item splitting

August 25, 2015, 1:32 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

During social service billing run (PSSC00_BILLING) we are trying to achieve below outcome -

 

NCD                                                                                                         Current behaviour            Expected Behaviour

Start date      End date        Identifier    Amount    SSP/SDP  ->              Billing document              Billing document

 

01.01.2001    15.01.2001    GUID1       $30.00-    SSP                              DOC1                             DOC1

01.01.2001    15.01.2001    GUID1       $5.00       SDP                              DOC1                             DOC2

10.01.2001    15.01.2001    GUID2       $10.00-    SSP                              DOC2                             DOC3

 

During billing process, system is trying to group the NCD based on identifier GUID. So essentially it is creating altogether 2 billing documents.

 

However, we want to achieve individual billing document per NCD item.

 

Please advice as how to achieve this.

 

Thanks

Bodhisattwa

↧

Funds management update (TWAER,FM_DOCUMENT_CHECK_DATA) Message No. FI057

March 28, 2016, 8:29 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

System error: Funds management update (TWAER,FM_DOCUMENT_CHECK_DATA)

Message No. FI057

 

This error occurred while posting goods issuance in MIGO. But this error does not occur when posting transaction in FB50. Also budget is not being consumed. I checked it with trace on, Fund, Fund Center and Commitment Item is being picked up from derivation rule and Commitment item is budgetary. I entered and released budget through FMBB. In FM report, consumable budget is shown but budget is not being consumed when transaction is posted through FB50.

 

Please help me in this matter.

 

Regards,

Atif

↧

System Error: Funds management update (PERIO,LFMOIVU8) FI057

March 28, 2016, 7:35 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We hit system error when try to change Work order/ close PR. We follow step in SAP notes 541315

-execute RFFMDLOI.

-run FMN3N

 

The steps were success for WO and PR without PO. But, if there is PO with same error triggered.

Thanks

↧

Start AVC from PO

April 1, 2016, 4:47 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have a question that is not clear in my mind. We want to start AVC from PO. The system shouldn't be check budget when users enter a PR in ME51N. For this subject, I configured update profile 102. as value type, I only configured value type 50 ( pruchase requsition ) with statistical update. I didnt configure any other value type. My question is that is it correct what I made customizing in OF39?

 

Best Regards

↧
↧

BCS - FMRP_RW_BUDCON "Available Amount" Negative

April 1, 2016, 12:39 pm
$
0
0

Hello FM experts,

 

I have the following issue with FM module. We are using BCS for budgeting and AVC, sometimes we face this problem:

 

When executing report FMRP_RW_BUDCON for some combinations of funds center and commitment item available amount is negative, so AVC error messages shows up for daily operation at SD, MM, etc.

 

When users execute the report the column consumed budget is not equal to commitment/actual column. So we have to execute FMAVCREINIT to delete the differences about 5 times per day.

 

Durinig day users make several transfers between combinations of funds center/commitment item to others using FMBB transaction. I think these operations are causing the differences on consumed budget and commitment/actual columns.

 

My question is: why AVC is not updated online when doing the transfers and why AVC permits to have an available amount with negative values?

 

Another thing i want to know how to determine which commitments are hard and which are soft.

 

Please i will appreciate your advice.

 

Regards,

 

Fernando

↧

The Dollar Street Project

April 3, 2016, 5:38 pm
$
0
0

I have long followed Hans Rosling's "Gap Minder" project (http://www.gapminder.org/), and was recently delighted to discover Ana Rosling Rönnlund's "Dollar Street" project (http://www.gapminder.org/dollar-street/). The Dollar Street project seeks to illustrate through photographs the relative living conditions of people based on their socio-economic status. I expect most of us inherently understand that living standards are more a function of socio-economic status than country of residence, but it is truly interesting to see this borne out in photographs. The challenge is of course in capturing, categorizing, accessing and analyzing these photographs, but this is a challenge we are certainly capable of overcoming with today's Big Data technologies. Happy viewing!

↧
Search

Consumable Budget column has no values for prior year in FMAVCR02

April 4, 2016, 9:36 pm
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

We are using 5 custom AVC ledgers Z1,Z2,Z3,Z4,Z5. We have enhanced Functional area so it can control prior year and current year values(meaning which ledgers are used prior year and which are used in current year).

 

Say for instance an agency used both Z1 and Z2 ledgers prior year and decided to use just Z2 ledger in the current year( this control will be maintained in FM_Function).

 

 

since, we made this change last year, When we execute the FMAVCR02 report for 2015(prior year) ledger Z1 and input the value of functional area and budget period in the selection screen we are unable to see any values in (system is just showing zero values)  consumable amount data column.  But able to see the consumed amount and available amount columns

 

However, since the agency is using Z2 ledger in 2016 all values are correctly displayed in FMAVCR02 report, the problem is occurring only when we try to see prior year values for Z1 ledger where the agency used both Z1 and Z2 ledgers.

 

Questions

 

1. We have defined 2 table look up rules in fmavcderiao to determine the current year and last year for agencies,does it have anything to do with not seeing the consumable amount column in FMAVCR02 ?

 

Please let me know what could be the potential reasons for this situation?

↧

VL31N FI311 Error

April 4, 2016, 11:46 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We have very urgent problem in VL31N. When we create a PO then create GR in MIGO, the system derive all account assignment and working correctly. But after PO, If we want to create GR in VL31N the system gives an error that there is no commitment item in item 0010. All fields are optinal for all movement types. I searched many oss note but I couldnt find helpful note about this issue. We debugged the VL31N and found a function FM_INPUT_CHECK_COBL. I filled in parameters for this function. It gives the same error also. Could anyone help me about this issue?

 

Thank you

Best Regards

↧
↧

FMCY102 - Transferred data does not match input parameters fiscal year 2016

April 5, 2016, 11:57 am
$
0
0

Hello guys.

 

I have a problem of integration with BPC (BW 7.4) and ECC (Release 740) FM module.

 

When we run the (FMCYCOPI_BW) transaction does not load the planning that was done in the BPC and presents the alert message

 

FMCY102 - Transferred data does not match input parameters fiscal year 2016.

 

In SAP ECC we made the setting (BW-FM-BCS Retractor Setting "SM34, VC_TBPBWRET_BCS") as the query that the PBOC advisor passed, but still keeps giving error.


Someone could send me a hand here or help me with some information?

 

Any help is welcome.

 

Attached is the details of what we are running.

 

Thank you in advance.

↧

Exchange Rate Differences between INVOICE and GOODS RECEIPT

April 5, 2016, 10:53 pm
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

 

Grant Management module enable us to use a different CURRENCY per each grant,

 

We found out, In some cases, Records originted from IV are not posted expressing the exchange rate as we expect.

 

 

 

Since all PO's are marked as "GR based";

 

The GR is REAL posted and the IV is STATISTICALLY posted.

 

as well as differences between IV and GR are REAL posted.

 

 

We found out that in a case that the GRANT currency is different than the GR currency, and is not a local currency,

 

than-

 

Exchange rate Differences between IV and GR are yet ATATISTICALLY posted and NOT real posted as we should expect.

 

 

For example -

 

 

PO/GR CUrrency =EURO

 

GRANT CURRENCY = USD DOLLAR

 

IV Currency = ILS (local Currency)

 

 

GR AMOUNT= 12,036.00 EURO ( GR/ PO CURRENCY)   / 52,487.79 ILS (LOCAL CURRENCY) / 13,686.52 USD (GRANT CURRENCY),

 

IV AMOUNT = 52,487.79 ILS (DOCUMENT CURRENCY) / 13,661.58 USD (GRANT CURRENCY)

 

In Grant Management balance -

IV amount is STATISTICALLY posted,

GR amount is REAL posted

 

 

The problem in the above example is that the diiference between GR and IV in GRANT CURRENCY is NOT real posted.

So that the GRANT balance is incorrect.

 

Anyone has an experience with this issue or has any idea for a solution?

Thank you and regards,

Orly

↧

BDC of Transaction FPCPL does not work in background

December 11, 2008, 1:45 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a BDC program for transaction FPCPL which is used for clarification of payments. The problem is program clears the payments when executed foreground but give an error while running background.

The error reads like "error creating docking control". please let us know how to execute this BDC in background or if there is work around like using BAPI or function module. Appreciate your help.

 

Thanks.

↧
Viewing all 163 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>