Hello Experts,
Recently we have activated Fund Management, If we are trying to make changes to network activity or WBS element system is throwing error as
"Error in commitment check (see costing log) Message No. CO634" and when tried to check the logs there are no further details displayed and no error message number.
Can anyone help us to resolve this issue
Hi
I have finished the customizing activities for FM- BCS, the derivation rules are ok but when I try to post a consumable budget document, I´m getting a short dump "Program "RFMATGRDES1000001 " not found."
I have read related posts indicating that the derivation rules might be wrong, so I activated the trace and they didn´t poped up any message. Please help me...
Thank´s in advance.
Dear all,
I am facing two unexpected behaviors from FM configuration and I would like to check with you, experienced professional, whether it is ok and possible solutions, Any help or advice would be really appreciated.
My customer requirement is to manage the budget as year basis. After creating a new FM área, named ORCA, as assigned it to the company code I am trying to complete these configuration steps without success.
I understand there is no configuration required here as customer needs to manage budget year dependent. By my point is: why the new FM área ORCA does not show up? Is it OK? Missing FM área at this point would cause inconsistences in the future?
2. (T-CODE FMSG) - Public Sector Management => Funds Management Government => Master Data => Account Assignment Elements => Funds Center => Hierarchy Variant => Assign Hierarchy Variant to FM Area
On the other hand we would like to work with year independent fund center máster data. As per SAP documentation, I can have hierarchy defined through the years by putting blank in fiscal year. Please, note the shotscreen above, fiscal year is required. I have tried to inform fiscal year 0000 and got the message F6508 "Hierarchy variant 000 is incomplete with regard to fiscal year 0000".
Just for record, Year-dependent máster data is not activated.
Thanks in advance for your attencion.
Kind regards,
Adriana
Hi all.
We have created a Material Document with movement type 552. Now we want to reverse that document using MBST transaction.
Original document is from 10 days ago.
When we are trying to save the reversed doc, error message FICUSTOM169 is shown: 'Carryforward level cannot be transferred from invoice reference'
Which is weird since no invoices are involved whatsoever.
We recently applied several Support Packages, now our SP Level is 16 (SAP 6.04). Prior to this update we neve had any problems.
Here is my OFUP customization:
Any ideas?.
Thanks and regards, Mauro.
Hi Eli,
This question is for you, but if someone else knows the answer, can reply as well 
I was reading the e-book written by Eli regarding PSM-FM, a excellent e-book by the way, but there was an information that I didn't understand.
The e-book mentions that is possible perform the mapping between FM objects and financial entities, for example, assign a commitment item to a G/L account. However, it also says that this action does not imply the derivation during postings of FI transactions.
I've already noticed that, but I'd like to understand the purpose of mapping the commitment item in a G/L account. When the commitment item information provided on G/L account is used and what for!?
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards,
Rodrigo Amorim
Hi everyone. The following problems have occured for the first time:
1) I post a PO, post downpayment referencing this PO (F-43), post invoice with MIRO. When I want to reverse the invoice with MR8M I get message no. FMAVC008. Customizing of automatic clearing of downpayment seems to be OK
2) I post a PO, post downpayment referencing this PO (F-43). When I try to post the invoice with tcode MIRO I get the error messa FMAVC005. Again, I believe the customizing point "Configure automatic clearing of down payments/down payment requests" is OK
I still have not been able to solve it. If you have any clue about this I would appreciate it. Thanks!
Gonzalo
Hi experts;
I have started PSM Fund Management components activation few days ago.
After search and with the help of our expert colleagues on SCN I managed to let Public Sector appear under both IMG as well easy menu.
through the following:
Activated three BC set
a. EA-PS-AKH
b. EA-PS-IMG
c. EA-PS-MENU
through T-code SCPR20
And on the SFW5 mentioned in front of the EA-PS Business Function will remain switched on
And press the Activate Changes button and gives message that it is running in background and later I find n o changes however I found that it is worked with another colleague on the Forum as mentioned here Funds Management Activation
And accordingly the IS-PS is yet inactive and its field is set on display mode on the BF11 or FIBF.
Main problem now is to manage to activate the IS-PS.
So may someone kindly advice and help how to solve such issue?
Thanks in advance;
Kind regards;
Ahmad Mahmud;
Hi,
We are facing a requirement to budget at a lower level than Sponsored Classes. Does anybody face a similar requirement? IS anybody using Internal Orders with GM?
Thanks!
Mariela
Hi Experts;
please refer to the following thread:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3818658
where I managed to activate the PSM FM components however the IS-PS is not active.
I've made all the proper activation as mentioned even the suggested by our expert colleague Eli Kloveski as mentioned in the above link.
Also when i attempted to open FR69 T-code Park Transfer I received the following error message:
Message no. FI291
If you want to use Funds Management Government functions, you must activate them in the Customizing of Funds Management Government, under Actual and Commitment Update/Integration -> Funds Management activate/deactivate.
Although, I've followed the mentioned path on the IMG and activated the AA Derivtn and Update for all company codes then tried with UNCHECKED the Update column and in either cases it is yet not active and giving the above message.
Can someone kindly advice and guide how to overcome such error please.
Thanks in advance;
Kind regards;
Ahmad Mahmud;
Gurus,
As of standard functionality all posting items with the same Final Recipient gets grouped (assuming event 1380 group is disabled) to create one single document on final recipient Contract Account/Contract Object.
I need to group posting items by Document Date / Payment Methods so that all posting items with same final recipient and posting date and payment method creates one document on final recipient each.
Can you guide me to use any FQEVENT or configuration which I may have overlooked.
Regards,
Ravi Ahuja
Hi,
We have implemented BCS ( Fund Management ) at our end and during testing we came across following scenario for which seeking solution.
We have put budget of Rs 100000 in fund center FC1 and Commitment Item CI1 combination in FY 2014. We have raised PO against these combination of Rs. 60000.Fund management report for these FC1 and CI1 combination for FY 2014 now see as
Consumable Consumed Available
FC1
CI1 100000 60000 40000
When we do carry forward for the same using t-code FMJ2, the same commitment and budget flew to next FY 2015. Now the same report read for FY 2014 and FY 2015 as
FY 2014
Consumable Consumed Available
FC1
CI1 NIL NIL NIL
FY 2015
Consumable Consumed Available
FC1
CI1 100000 60000 40000
Now in FY 2015, I am deleting line items from PO, the same report now read as
FY 2015
Consumable Consumed Available
FC1
CI1 100000 0 100000
Ideally when I am deleting line item from PO, the commitment should disappear and the requirement is to have available budget of Rs. 40000 in FY 2015. The Report should read like
FY 2015
Consumable Consumed Available
FI1
CI1 100000 0 40000
Which is not happening in current environment ...Are we missing on some config??/
Kindly guide us.
Thanks
Parag
Hello!
Our client is asking for an impact analysis regarding the change of the GR/IR update settings from IR to GR (in tcode OFUP). It appears possible, but it will require the deletion of the FM updates for the purchase requisitions, purchase orders, and invoice receipts followed by the reconstruction of these documents. This client has 16 years worth of data, so it will only be feasible to reconstruct the data from a point moving forward (i.e. new fiscal year). What is the impact having FM historical data updated with OFUP at IR with future data updating FM with OFUP set at GR?
I would appreciate any lessons learned regarding this important change in OFUP. THANK YOU!!!
Hi experts,
As you all know funds management has 5 accounts assignments which are Funds Centre, Fund, Funded program, functional area, and commitment item. If an organization wants to use additional account assignments to this, for example they want to use geographical location in Funds Management budgeting, what would be the best way to do it, that is how do we create an additional account assignment or how do we cater for this? There are 3 more master data structures they want to use in FM over and above the standard accounts I have given above. I will really appreciate your help.
Regards
Jordan
Dear Expert
My issue is related to Integration between MM and FM.
My PO is created with Valuated material. As a standard process when any material is received (GRN) free of cost from the vendors, since field UMSON is ticked, then as a standard behavior, system should make this material as non valuated with no accounting impact. But in my case, system is asking for Fund Center.. Why?
Please advise the correction.
Thanks
Syed Zia Abbas
Hi all,
There is no documentation on how to use the field USERDIM in funds management. Kindly explain how this field is used and in what scenarios. The information I have is it is available for users but it is certainly not in used in SAP. I take it that it should only be used as an enhancement.
Regards
Jordan
Hi,
I have a scenario of sales return and its impact in Funds Management. Lets say i have a total budget of 10,000 for sales. I record a sale or 8,000 today which in Funds Management will show m consumption of 8,000. Now there is a sale return of 1,000. When i post this return system will revert back consumption of 1000 and now total consumption of budget will be 7,000 which is fine in case where sale is recorded and returned on the same Funds Management assignments. We have divided our fund on the basis of months like OPEX-JAN, OPEX-FEB etc. Now fund is derived based on the posting date and budget impacts are posted accordingly. Lets say i recorded a sales of 8000 on the last day of Jan and in Funds Management it was updated against Fund REV-JAN. Next day sales of 1000 was returned. Now posting this return will derive fund of REV-FEB and now system throws me an error that budget is over consumed. this is because there is no consumption posted in REV-FEB from which this 1000 is to be reversed. The actual consumption was in REV-JAN and this should be reversed from the same. But this is not the case here we record sale reversals in the date it was reversed as we close our receivables on daily basis. Can any one help me out here how can i handle this in SAP.
Regards,
Dear Experts,
I experience error message FMUP127 on several transaction such as GI, service acceptance, and GR transaction.
FYI, this happens after upgrade to EA-PS 617. Several SAP Notes (2090247, 1908799) had been applied, but still no luck.
Can anyone help me on this? Thx.
Regards,
Ratih
Hi:
I have seen three types of budgeting in FM-BCS. Payment budget, commitment budget and financial budget , to date i have worked on payment budgets and its all related configuration. I have ready about these three types on SAP help but not very clear about these.Which budget will be offered to client..For me Payment budget works fine bit if client asks for other two types as well how can i make him clear about commitment and financial budget and their intended use in FM.
Regards
Dear all,
Would you please guide me on this issue resolution?
Should PSM-FM activation (Public Sector Management => Funds Management Goverment => Basic Setting => Activate Global Funds Management Function (PSM-FM)) be performed under each cliente individually?
I have created a CR in the Golden client and among the instance (DEV sandbox and DEV test environments) the CR import works fine. But after releasing this CR and going to QAS environment the content is not updated. I have tried the Table View => Transport option but it also did not work.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Adriana
Hello,
I'm working on ECC in Former budget.
When I create an invoice from MIRO, the amount in table FMIFIIT in the field business transaction (VRGNG) is RFBU - FI: Postings.
After upgrading the system, the amount in the invoice from MIRO is now displaying RMRP - Incoming invoice in the field business transaction (VRGNG).
Do you know the reasons of the changes?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Best regards,
Chiachen